Salò is Uncomfortable but Still Worth Watching
This is a version of the Marquis de Sade’s story, The 120 Days of Sodom, a story about four powerful men who enslave two dozen teenagers and torture them repeatedly. Unlike the book the film is set in the Salò Republic, the Nazi puppet state in northern Italy, in the year 1944. Pier Paolo Pasolini directs his final film. The four powerful men in the story are referred to as the Duke, the Magistrate, the President and the Bishop. To kick things off they marry each other’s daughters and then begin to have young males and females kidnapped (18 in all, 9 of each gender). They also have four older prostitutes join in and this whole multitude marches over to some palace. Mind you, the time period means that the Nazi occupied Salò Republic is on its last legs and on the cusp of being crippled by the Allied forces. So the setting gives us sort of an end of days feeling right from the get-go. The content and commentary certainly continue with that subject matter throughout.
The film is set up in four stages, the first being the ante-inferno, which refers to those who are not quite condemned to hell but also not allowed into heaven either. The film’s setting is meant to feel like a brief moment in purgatory with its isolated party of characters doing unspeakable things before judgment, and then it all must end. The second stage is the circle of manias, or obsession, where we see the sexual humiliation of the film manifest itself further. The third stage is the circle of excrement, which is where we see the characters consume feces. Pasolini has used this as a metaphor broadly for the perverse level of consumption depicted in the film overall, and directly as a commentary on mass-produced foods and consumerism. The fourth stage is the circle of blood, this is where those who do not partake in this bizarre corruption are brutally murdered in various ways. The stages bring us further and further downward into degeneracy, which Pasolini has applied strongly as a denunciation against capitalism and fascism.
If you found any interest in the above commentary, then I assume Salò may be just the film for you, but I assure you that the film is definitely not for everyone. It is up front with its content. It’s controversial for many different reasons, but primarily it is the visual content that turns people away. Yes, it’s not as violent as your typical modern horror fare and the nudity is certainly not quite as pretty as it is in some movies meant and made for that, but Salò is anything other than an exploitation film. One may even argue that it is the exact opposite of exploitation. It is Salò’s censure of exploitation that makes it truly disturbing as a modern social commentary, and perhaps is one of the reasons we see this film getting more and more attention with time.
My rating is 4 out of 5 stars.






I’ve only just commented on your Daybreakers review but having looked through the blog I feel I should comment again. Basically just because you bring up several films I love and/or have seen recently myself.
Your piece on Eyes Wide Shut made me want to give it a second chance, Wild Strawberries is my favourite Bergman and now Salo – which I only saw a couple of months ago. It’s nice to find someone else wrestling with the film as it needs talking about but there aren’t many people I know personally who would even consider seeing it.
I thought the structure of the film was excellent and there’s (rather obviously) something to be said about those characters who are standing by yet neither participating or intervening. I really need to see it again to make a more worthwhile critique but I’m not sure it’s something I want to revisit (I still can’t get the voice of the character whining ‘mange, mange’ out of my head).
In writing this I find myself calling to mind Haneke’s White Ribbon from last year. Another film which intimates thoughts of the world wars, good/evil, action/inaction via the relationships between adults and children.
Once again, great blog.
Pasolini was a crazy but also a cerebral filmmaker. Salo has a reputation that precedes itself and for those two reasons the film is worth being pondered over. I will be sure to check out White Ribbon on your recommendation. Thanks again for the positive feedback.
Well said, Salo is one of the more fascinating films that have been made. It’s truly shocking and relentless, it doesn’t hold back any punches. But it is filmed so well, everything that happens is orchestrated beautifully, and yes violence can be beautiful! It certainly makes you think about the caged monster within each of us, and after the purpose of most films is to confront us with that beast, most films are just too afraid to do it this effectively. I highly recommend you read this article on the film
http://mubi.com/notebook/posts/the-fearful-symmetry-of-pier-paolo-pasolinis-salo